
Digital asset fund flows | August 18th 2025
2 min read
- Data
The materials on this website or any third-party websites accessed herein are not associated with and have not been reviewed or approved by: (i) Valkyrie Funds LLC dba CoinShares, its products, or the distributor of its products, or (ii) CoinShares Co., its products, or the marketing agent of its products.
Ethereum Dominates as Digital Asset Inflows Hit $3.75bn
Digital asset investment products saw US$3.75bn inflows, the fourth-largest on record, driving AuM to an all-time high of US$244bn.
Ethereum led with US$2.87bn inflows (77% of total), pushing YTD inflows to a record US$11bn, far surpassing Bitcoin on a proportional basis.
Solana and XRP saw inflows of US$176.5m and US$125.9m respectively. Conversely, Litecoin and Ton saw outflows of US$0.4m and US$1m respectively.
Digital asset investment products saw US$3.75bn in inflows last week, the fourth-largest on record, marking a strong rebound after several weeks of tepid sentiment. Unusually, almost all inflows were concentrated in a single provider, iShares, and one specific investment product. Total assets under management (AuM) reached an all-time high of US$244bn on 13th August following recent price rises.
Regionally, the United States dominated flows, accounting for 99% of the total (US$3.73bn). Smaller inflows were recorded in Canada (US$33.7m), Hong Kong (US$20.9m), and Australia (US$12.1m). Meanwhile, Brazil and Sweden saw modest outflows of US$10.6m and US$49.9m respectively.

Ethereum continues to steal the show, with inflows totalling a record US$2.87bn last week, representing 77% of total weekly inflows, also bringing year-to-date (YTD) inflows to a record US$11bn. The inflows far outstrip Bitcoin, with YTD inflows representing 29% of AuM compared to Bitcoin’s 11.6%.
Bitcoin saw modest inflows in comparison, totalling US$552m, while assets Solana and XRP saw substantive inflows of US$176.5m and US$125.9m respectively. Conversely, Litecoin and Ton saw minor outflows of US$0.4m and US$1m respectively.





